Feeds:
Posts
Comments
Image

If you feed me, I promise to act normally.

The Underpants household has recently taken delivery of a new dog. He is a medium sized, off-white creature of indeterminate genetic heritage, but definitely slightly gun-doggish. For the want of anything better, we’ve decided to call him Houndle.

He is less than a year old and is currently programmed for not much other than voracious consumption, wanton destruction and sleep (there are certain other side effects of his existence, on the subject of which I shall remain silent).

Having named him after our fair town I was struck by the extent to which he resembles it.

Take, as an example, the principal route through each, In Oundle’s case from the Benefield Road in the west to Station Road in the East. In Houndle’s case from the end that barks to the end that doesn’t. How like my boisterous little pooches’ gastro-intestinal tract the A427 is (the A standing, I assume, for Alimentary).

Now whether Station Road or Benefield Road is the esophagus, I will leave the residents of Laxton Drive and Wakerley close to argue over, being at either end of the principal route through our urban anatomy. But whichever way the current is flowing, I think that there can be little doubt that the Market square has its canine equivalent in Houndle’s portly and indiscriminate stomach. Basically, goodies flow in where they are processed and distributed quickly and efficiently to those places where they will do the most good.

Around this smugly rounded belly the other vitals sit; The heart (Schools), The Liver (Commerce), The Lungs (Churches (no doubt Dizz will object)), The Brain (Town Hall…. (Yeah right!)). Whichever aspect of the town you would wish to twin with its respective part of the dogs anatomy (suggestions on a postcard please) they all benefit from the various nutrients carried there by the carriageway in question.

In Houdle’s case, these nutrients consist of a varied diet of Doggo economy biscuits, administered twice daily by Mrs U and Self, together an assortment of sweets, unwanted vegetables,  peanut butter, chili peppers , beer and a dead spider (all provided at various times by one or other of the Nappies). Finally of course there are the self administered nutrients that, amongst other things, include horse poo, Lucretia’s discarded underwear, the contents of Mrs U’s flower bed and my new I-phone.

About eight weeks ago despite this varied and eclectic diet, Houndle began to lose weight quite rapidly. It wasn’t for the want of food; he was a four-legged vacuum cleaner, hoovering up anything vaguely edible that came within three feet of his little wet nose. But, to Mrs U’s increasing concern, his nose became drier and his erstwhile shiny yellow coat became more and more lackluster hanging off his poor little emaciated frame.

Finally, Mrs U took him down South Road to the Vets. She returned much relieved. After a small amount of probing, the vet had announced that Houndle had a nasty little parasitic worm, Tinea Waitrosea.

Apparently what this unpleasant and highly invasive parasite does is lodge itself in the intestine of its victim, upstream of the stomach, and intercepts all of the goodness flowing into organism into whose body it has trespassed. Of course there is no symbiosis in its relationship with the body in which it lives. It doesn’t redistribute any of the goodness it extracts, it just keeps it for itself; growing bloated at the expense of its increasingly unhealthy host.

You will be relieved to note that one large orange pill, two days, an incredibly unpleasant episode in the back garden and a vast amount of Doggo economy biscuits later Houndle was back to his previous bouncy and flatulent self.

It’s such a relief that, by contrast, our town can’t, unwittingly, ingest a similar malign parasite that will suck the goodness out of its poor little system and leave it a weakened and unhealthy shadow of its former self.

Are we there yet?

David Milliband’s tweet

“UK jumped into rowing boat with Hungary next to 25 nation supertanker. That is weakness not strength”

shows how dangerous a metaphor can be in the wrong hands. To compare the Euro with a supertanker is naive at best and foolish at worst.

So many other nautical metaphors leap to mind to help make sense of the madness that is the euro debate. But the one that I favour is the “Ship of fools”. The disparate medieval mob of the deranged, frivolous and oblivious, aboard a ship without a pilot and seemingly ignorant of their own direction.

Clearly several members of the “crew” have a strong sense of where they think they’re heading but I’m not sure that everybody aboard is fully aware of just how choppy the waters and how meagre the rations will be.

My view is that “Captain” Merkel and “First mate” Sarkozy are currently united by a desperate desire to avoid the economic Maelstrom of the disintegration of the single currency. However, I also think that their course is being subtly effected by the undercurrents of political vanity, given the massive loss of face that will result in the falure to launch of the economic vessel for which their two nations were the principal architects.

If the good ship Euro, with it’s motley regular crew and eight pressganged landlubbers, gets through the storm, then that will be the time that the wisdom, or otherwise, of Cameron’s unwillingness to jump aboard will become apparent.

As the boat, low on provisions and morale drifts into the Sargasso and the underlying tensions between those on board surfaces, then we will see whether our government has made the right call. At present it is convenient for those who don’t share Cameron’s view to cast him as the villain. But as he (and we) sink below the western horizon we will quickly be forgotten and any tension on board will turn inward.

How Germany and France will deal with their fundamental political and economic differences and how this will effect the politics/economics of the Eurozone will be the real story.

In truth, I think that all the seafaring talk is part of the problem. Whatever it is that we are all aboard (or not as the case may be), the fundamental question should be not “Where is it hoping to go?” but “is it capable of setting off?”

My issue with the enthusiasm of the Euromariners is that, despie the fact that their vessel is wallowing in heavy seas and holed dangerously close to the waterline, they appear to be intent on plotting a course on an exciting new  voyage, and like all inveterate travellers, they are utterly contemptuous of those who would stop awhile and think.

 I sincerely wish them well. But, like the coalition leadership, I’m niether brave enough to climb on board nor willing to pay the fare demanded.

 If that’s weakness the let’s all sit around the fireside and wait to inherit the earth.

 

If you take anything I say seriously - then you're the fool.

Oh yes you are!

Do I sympathise with the grievances of the public sector workers, regarding their loss of pension rights? Of course I do. Do I agree with the arguments they put forward in defence of their position? I’m afraid I don’t.

It is easy in these current uncertain times to fall back to the populist and fundamentally flawed argument that it is the “bankers/financial markets/speculators etc” who are solely responsible for all our current woes and therefore if we contrast our own particular situation with that of some amoral, fat-cat banker, then that will justify our argument for maintaining/improving that position.

The fact is that, for generations, our expectations of what civilized society is capable of providing have far outstripped the capabilities of that society to actually provide the quality of life we have been encouraged to expect.

Do I think that Teachers, Nurses, Policemen, Soldiers etc deserve to be properly rewarded by the society they serve?…. Yes! Do I think that the very old, the very young, the infirm and the vulnerable should be properly protected by the society they share with us more fortunate souls?…. Of course I do!

The proper respect and reward for the people who do the jobs that are necessary to ensure that our society is humane and civilized is what makes our society humane and civilized. As is the proper care and respect for those who, for no fault of their own, need the support of that society.

Sadly, and here’s the rub, Society has to pay for that. How? Through either taxes or government borrowing (which is only deferred taxation). And in the current climate the tax revenue is falling. By contract the cost of the welfare state is rising.

How do we as a society pay for all of this? Do we increase the taxes on businesses that generate the revenue that creates the taxes, thus making them less competetive and consequently less able to generate the much needed taxes? Or perhaps we go to the financiers in the Bond markets and borrow more money to fund the various commitments that society has made on our behalf.

It is as pointless blaming the bankers for the current situation as it is blaming the Greeks… To give an example, the annual revenue of the state funded, Greek railway system is about 100million Euros. The annual wage bill of the same Greek railway system is 400million Euros. The average (average!!)  salary of a Greek railway worker was until quite recently 65,000 Euros. The reckless borrowing by the Greek government, to fund what was essentially a corrupt public service, is one of the factors (along with many others) that have plunged us all in to the mess we’re in. I don’t hear any criticism by the various Public Sector unions of the Greek civil service.

On the one hand we have the public sector unions and a small cohort of other politically motivated activists who are mixing up the whole of the private sector into one toxic pudding and putting Fred Goodwin on top in order to “prove” that it is the sleazy “free market capitalists” who are to blame for our current woes. On the other hand there are the wealthy vested interests (in the more questionable boardrooms of the City), using the example of the Greek railway worker and the like as “evidence”, to blame a lazy, bloated and self-serving civil service for the national debt and the crisis that goes with it. In the middle there are the rest of us trying to come to some reasonable conclusions under this constant bombardment of partisan tosh.

Whose fault is it really??…… I don’t know! But I am convinced that, unless we, as individuals, all take a long hard look at the extent to which we benefit society; as opposed to bleating on about how society owes us a favour and how it’s all somebody else’s fault, then let’s break out the instruments and play discordant music until the ship we’re all on sinks in to the stormy sea and we each can each cling to whatever wreckage there is left.

That’s why I support the Con/Lib coalition. Despite their differences (after all the Tories are a bunch of public school educated toffs with nothing more to worry about than the maintenance of their country estates and the Liberal Democrats are the only thing that even approximated to a consistently loony left-wing voice in British politics for the last decade and a half) they appear to be risking alienating large sections of the full panorama of the electorate by pursing negotiated policies that no sensible politician would consider; unless, that is, they sincerely think that it might be a solution to the problems we find ourselves in.

"Oi Pants, I can see your house from up here!"

It was recently my good fortune to be strolling along East road at about 8:20 am. The sky was blue, the air was balmy and a gentle breeze caressed my flowing blond curls. Above I heard the plaintive “kee-kee” of a red kite and looking up, squinting slightly against the citrus morning sunshine, I caught a glimpse of this majestic creature as she circled slowly above my head.

“The secret of a rich life” I pondered philosophically “is to appreciate the moment as it unfolds.” Thus I proceeded eastwards, in parallel to the path of my airborne companion. Nothing could assail my fortress of contented bonhomie, except possibly the almost imperceptible metallic throbbing that grated at the very edge of my consciousness. The sound of some infernal, hidden mechanism pusating beneath the surface of the Earth.

It was at this point that, in a puff of russet feathers, the red kite was catapulted hundreds of feet into the air in an instant, so high that she was almost lost from view as she made her slightly surprised way onwards towards Laxton drive.

What’s strange micro-climatological system could have caused this phenomenon?

I hurried onwards towards spot at which it had occured and the throbbing increased. Finally, as I rounded the bend next to the Joan Strong centre, the reason for this strange event became clear.

I have never before had cause to pass Laxton junior school at either end of the school day. But the impressive display of unnecessary horsepower is enough to make even the most inveterate petrol-head swoon. One could almost feel the air being sucked in towards the entrance of this esteemed educational establishment as the huge column of carbon dioxide, superheated by the idling car engines, rushed heavenwards in some mad atmospheric geyser.

It was hard to spot anything in the assembled array of transportation that was not enthusiastically contributing to global warming.

As far as I can see the car ownership of the average Laxton school parent falls into one of two categories as follows:

1) the “I’ve got significantly more money than I really need and therefore I’m going to waste some of the residue on both purchasing and fuelling a ludicrously overpowered car” or,
2) the “I’ve got slightly less money than I really require and therefore I’ve got to compromise and buy a rather out of date and inefficient vehicle, so that I can afford the school fees’ .

Even the lithe and athletc mums who had walked down to the school, clad in Lycra leggings and trainers like Teddy boys brothel creepers who, having dropped their offspring off, go for a run. Consquently burning off hundreds of calories that also contribute to the soaring air currents that had so efficiently propeled my erstwhile companion heavenwards.

Proportional representation

The benefits of Proportional Representation - a graphic example

 

They say that “No news is good news” in which case, we are all deeply in it! To paraphrase the Chinese curse, we live in “interesting times”. Will and Kate are married, Osama wasn’t invited, Nick Clegg got a right royal kicking and we had the “most exciting town meeting I have attended” (Sarah Hillman).

Where on earth do I start? As I have little personal interest in either royalty or religion, I guess I’d better stick to democracy. Did you vote? On the basis of the polls, at least two thirds of you voted for the wonderful First past the Post System, which has given us Councillors Ribcage and Sternum for the last 427 years. Clearly this is a system that is eminently fit for purpose.

I can only guess from the effusive outpourings of Sarah, Owsdat and Nickers that they consider democracy is alive and well and living in East Northamptonshire.

Personally I think that, on the basis of recent events, recession is not a good thing for either democracy or rational thought. How else would Alex McGabe and all of his nationalist SANU (Scottich Anglican National Union) thugs have gained control Of Scotland District Council? Still with any luck they will vote to reinstate Hadrian’s wall, shut the door and hopefully take all their bloody politicians with thm  (Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, David Steele, Norris McWhirter, Diane Abbott, Germaine Greer etc)

It was interesting that Mrs U and I were recently discussing Messers Cameron and Clegg and we agreed that it was hard to find anything to dislike about either of them… Methinks that, given David’s recent performance, at least Nick might disagree with us.

Still, now that we’re not getting proportional representation, it is comforting to know that all of those babies and soldiers will be so much safer, now that we don’t have to waste all that money ensuring that our votes count.

As for democracy, my correspondent tells me that the rousing contributions of both councillors Ribcage and Sternum at the Oundle town meeting were a worthy testament to the enduring power and quality of our democratic system and its selfless operatives.

Ian Hislop completely loses control upon hearing another impromptu one-liner from our multitalented MP

Who Needs super-injunctions? If our gonad controlled premiership footballers and the odd BBC political hack (I’m right behind you Andrew) ever have the ability to take out super-injunctions removed by our repressive legal system, they need not worry. All they have to do is to invest some of their well-earned money in finding a way to switch the Internet off and, at a stroke, they will completely neutralise the capacity of the press to locate any details about them whatsoever.

How do I know this? In the three days since the picturesque Ms B uttered her now infamous bleep (the most interesting thing I am aware of her ever having said), Oundle Underpants has had over 500 hits on on the ensuing days.

Now much as I would like to believe that this (slight) spike in my average stats was down to my incisive piece on Oundle 2020, or perhaps the heartrending conclusion to the lot less lardy life drama, I have to conclude that, in reality, starved of any other means of obtaining information, the world (or at least 347 people using the search term “Louise Bagshaw “) have turned to one of the few remaining, truly unimpeachable sources of raw data.

It is further interesting to note that it is currently impossible to access www.louisebagshawe.net
due to her “bandwidth being exceeded”……….. I will send her the details Of the Lot Less Lardy Life.

ps. At 8.00am today…. a dozen hits with the following search terms “louise bagshawe, louise bagshawe mp, oundle underpants, louise bagshawe., andrew marr and woman” What would the news-hungry world do without my selfless service??  (and yes, there were seperate searches for Louise Bagshaw and Louise Bagshaw full stop (maybe that’s wishful searching))

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.